Sne Engineering Co Ltd v. Hsin Chong Construction Co Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1466/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 March 2014.
1. In paragraph 3, “Nam Chong” should read “Nam Cheong”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 1466/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 1466 of 2012 _____________
_____________
_______________ CORRIGENDUM _______________ 1.In paragraph 3, “Nam Chong” should read “Nam Cheong”. 2.In paragraph 4, “Dragages-Bonuygues" should read “Dragages-Bouygues”. 3.In paragraphs 144, 145 and 247, “creditability” should read “credibility”. 4.In paragraph 156, “one should not be too difficult to understand” should read “it should not be too difficult for one to understand”. 5.In paragraph 195, “providing” should read “proving”. 6.In paragraph 226, “tending” should read “tendering”. 7.In paragraph 245, “ascent” should read “accent”. 8.In paragraph 275, “tortuous” should read “tortious”. 9.In paragraph 278, “there are a multiple of reasons” should read “there are multiple reasons”. Dated the 11th day of April 2014
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1466/2012