Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1906/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The plaintiff (“ Teaman ”) claims for the outstanding balance of the cost of design and decoration work done and materials supplied to the office premises of the defendant (“ Lakco ”). Lakco disputes the amount claimed. It also complains about delay and defective work; and counterclaims for loss and damage. After trial, I gave judgment in favour of Teaman, after set-off by the extent of counterclaim allowed, with costs. Lakco applied for leave to appeal. After hearing, I refused leave with co
Cites 2 cases