Keen Lloyd Holdings and Others v. Commissioner of Customs and Excise and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 113/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 December 2014.

1. The paragraph 21 on page 10 Line R,

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 113/2012
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Dec 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 113/2012 and
HCAL 82/2013
(Consolidated)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 113 OF 2012

____________

BETWEEN

  KEEN LLOYD HOLDINGS LIMITED 1st Applicant
  YINGGAO SHIPPING (H.K.) LIMITED 2nd Applicant
  SHAN AO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3rd Applicant
  YOUNG CRYSTAL LIMITED 4th Applicant
  ECO METAL (HONG KONG) LIMITED 5th Applicant

and

  COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE 1st Respondent
  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2nd Respondent
____________

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 82 OF 2013

____________

AND BETWEEN    
  KEEN LLOYD HOLDINGS LIMITED 1st Applicant
YINGGAO SHIPPING (H.K.) LIMITED 2nd Applicant
  SHAN AO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3rd Applicant
  YOUNG CRYSTAL LIMITED 4th Applicant
  ECO METAL (HONG KONG) LIMITED 5th Applicant
  LEUNG KA YIP 6th Applicant
  CHUN CHOR SHING 7th Applicant
  MAK PUI CHEONG 8th Applicant
  CHUN YUET-MING, JESSICA 9th Applicant
  Chin Kam Chiu 10th Applicant

and

  Commissioner of Customs and Excise 1st Respondent
  Department of Justice 2nd Respondent
____________
  (Consolidated by order of the Honourable Mr Justice McWalters
dated the 22nd day of May 2013)
 
     
Before: Hon McWalters JA in Court (sitting as an additional Judge of the Court of First Instance)
Dates of Hearing:  26-29 August, 12, 17 September,5, 7 December 2013,
   20, 22 and 23 January 2014
Date of Judgment:  23 December 2014

________________________

CORRIGENDUM
________________________

1.The paragraph 21 on page 10 Line R,

“It empowers the entry and search of any “premises or place” but, as I have said, it is drafted as being subject to section 22.”

should read

“In section 21(1)(a), it empowers the entry and search of any “premises or place” but, as I have said, it is drafted as being subject to section 22. ”

2.Wherever “section 21(1)” appears in the following paragraphs it should be replaced with “section 21(1)(a)”:

(a) paragraph 22 on page 11 Lines I, K, L and N,

(b) paragraph 24 on page 12 Line F,

(c) paragraph 63 on page 25 Lines T and page 26 Line D,

(d) paragraph 64 on page 26 Line M,

(e) paragraph 65 on page 26 Line T,

(f) paragraph 66 on page 27 Line A,

(g) paragraph 77 on page 31 Lines B and G,

(h) paragraph 78 on page 31 Line L,

(i) paragraph 79 on page 31 Line M,

(j) paragraph 80 on page 31 Line R,

(k) paragraph 82 on page 32 Line P,

(l) paragraph 91 on page 36 Line K,

(m) paragraph 93 on page 37 Line I,

(n) paragraph 95 on page 38 Line N,

(o) paragraph 102 on page 42 Line G,

(p)paragraph 112 on page 45 Lines M and P,

(q) paragraph 115 on page 46 Line J,

(r) paragraph 159 on page 60 Lines G and I,

(s) paragraph 184(iii) on page 71 Lines J and L,

Dated this 10th day of February, 2015.

  (Danny Tse)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters JA