Read the full judgment text of DCCC 1025/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 11 May 2015.
1. On 23 March 2015, the defendant (D1) pleaded guilty to a charge of attempting to obtain property by deception, contrary to s 17(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 and s 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. His sentence was adjourned pending the outcome of the trial of his co-accused (D2) who was jointly charged with him, there being some indication that D1 might be required to give evidence for D2. In the event, D1 had not been called to give evidence at D2’s trial. On 27 April 2015, D2
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases