Read the full judgment text of HCMA 475/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 8 January 2015.
1. The appellant was charged with one count of “theft” (Charge 1) and one count of “obtaining property by deception” (Charge 2), contrary to sections 9 and 17(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 of the Laws of Hong Kong respectively. On his own plea, the appellant was convicted of both charges by Magistrate Mr David Chum in the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts. He was sentenced to 4 months’ imprisonment in respect of Charge 1, and 4 months’ imprisonment for Charge 2 with 2 months of which to run con
Cited by 6 cases · Cites 3 cases