New judgments

We are satisfied that a point of law of great and general importance is involved in the appeal and grant leave to appeal in respect of it, namely:

申請人是DCCC 355/2022七名被告中的D3。他和其餘六人分別被控一項或以上的‘洗黑錢’。申請人承認當中的控罪3和8，同案的D4則在審訊後被裁定控罪4和9罪成。至於D1，他不但承認DCCC 355/2022的控罪1，而且也承認DCCC 446/2022的另一項‘洗黑錢’。負責合併處理兩案的原審法官（林偉權法官）把三人分別判囚37個月（D1）、31個月（申請人）和32個月（D4）。申請人不服，就判刑提出上訴許可申請，申請直接交由上訴法庭處理。

第四被告人在2025年6月18日存檔傳票，就區域法院暫委法官沈偉民（「原審法官」）2025年6月6日拒絕他的上訴許可申請的判決，向上訴法庭申請上訴許可。

This is the applicant’s appeal against the order of Deputy High Court Judge To (“ the Judge ”) dated 8 May 2025 ( [2025] HKCFI 1922 ) (“ the Leave Decision ”) refusing his application for leave to apply for judicial review (“ the Leave Application ”) against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (“ the Board ”) dated 15 January 2025 (“ the Board’s Decision ”), whereby the Board dismissed his appeal against the decision of the Director of Imm

This is the applicant’s appeal against the order of Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) Martin Wong (“ the Judge ”) dated 16 April 2025 ( [2025] HKCFI 1549 ) (“ the Leave Decision ”) refusing his application for leave to apply for judicial review (“ the Leave Application ”) against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (“ the Board ”) dated 19 December 2019 (“ the Board’s Decision ”), whereby the Board dismissed his appeal again

This is the applicant’s appeal against the order of Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) Philips Wong (“ the Judge ”) dated 14 April 2025 ( [2025] HKCFI 1238 ) (“ the Leave Decision ”) refusing his application for leave to apply for judicial review (“ the Leave Application ”) against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (“ the Board ”) dated 4 December 2019 (“ the Board’s Decision ”), whereby the Board dismissed his appeal again