Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 215/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 September 2015.
1. The plaintiff claims against the defendant for the repayment of a sum of $1,000,000, whereas the defendant counterclaims for the repayment of a sum of $50,000. The plaintiff’s case is that there was an oral agreement between them in which she agreed to lend HK$1,100,000 without interest to the defendant for paying the further deposit of the purchase of a property. The defendant repaid $50,000, leaving $1,050,000 unpaid. In order to set her claim within the jurisdiction of the District Court,
Cites 3 cases