Read the full judgment text of CACV 101/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 15 May 2017.
3. The plaintiff applies to adduce the 6 th affirmation of Matsumoto purportedly to respond to the 3 rd affirmation of Tang. We are not prepared to admit this evidence. The plaintiff already had the chance to put forward its case fully on security in the 4 th and 5 th affirmations of Matsumoto. All the evidence in support of its financial viability should be produced at one time instead of in a piecemeal manner. Arguments against the defendant’s submissions should be raised in counsel’s subm
Cites 2 cases