Read the full judgment text of FACV 11/2016 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 21 June 2017.
1. I agree that this appeal must be allowed and agree with the answers given to the questions in respect of which leave to appeal was granted. There is no doubt that the Court had jurisdiction over the respondent, a Hong Kong permanent resident who was duly served and acknowledged service within the jurisdiction. It was bound to assume jurisdiction over the respondent unless it was persuaded that the proceedings should be stayed, on forum non conveniens principles. Having assumed jurisdiction,
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case