Competition Commission v. Nutanix Hong Kong Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of CTEA 1/2017 on BabelCite. This CTEA judgment was delivered on 3 October 2017.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CTEA 1/2017
Court
CTEA
Date03 Oct 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CTEA 1/2017

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION NO 1 OF 2017

____________

BETWEEN

  COMPETITION COMMISSION Applicant

and

  NUTANIX HONG KONG LIMITED 1st Respondent
  BT HONG KONG LIMITED 2nd Respondent
  SIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3rd Respondent
  INNOVIX DISTRIBUTION LIMITED 4th Respondent
  (trading as “INNOVIX DISTRIBUTION”)  
  TECH‑21 SYSTEMS LIMITED 5th Respondent

____________

Before: Hon G Lam J, President of the Competition Tribunal in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 18 September 2017

Date of Decision: 3 October 2017

Date of Corrigendum: 7 December 2017

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

In the Decision of the above case given by the Competition Tribunal on 3 October 2017, the correction reads as follows: -

Page 28, paragraph 75, line 2, delete “every” and substitute with “very”.

  (Gloria CHAN)
Clerk to Hon G. Lam J