Competition Commission v. Nutanix Hong Kong Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of CTEA 1/2017 on BabelCite. This CTEA judgment was delivered on 17 May 2019.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CTEA 1/2017
Court
CTEA
Date17 May 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CTEA 1/2017

[2019] HKCT 2

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION NO 1 OF 2017

____________

BETWEEN
  COMPETITION COMMISSION Applicant
and
  NUTANIX HONG KONG LIMITED 1st Respondent
  BT HONG KONG LIMITED 2nd Respondent
  SIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3rd Respondent
  INNOVIX DISTRIBUTION LIMITED 4th Respondent
  (trading as “INNOVIX DISTRIBUTION”)  
  TECH‑21 SYSTEMS LIMITED 5th Respondent

____________

Before: Hon G. Lam J, President of the Competition Tribunal
Dates of Hearing: 20-22, 25-29 June, 3 July, 17-20 September 2018
Date of Judgment: 17 May 2019
Date of Corrigendum: 10 June 2019

_____________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________________

In the judgment of the above case given by the Competition Tribunal on 17 May 2019, the correction reads as follows: -

Para 225, line Q: “... that would not be counted but would not win,”should be “... that would be counted but would not win,”.

 

Dated this the 10th  June 2019

 
 

  (Carol Yeung)
  Clerk to President of the Competition Tribunal