Secretary for Justice v. Lau Kwok Leung
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 43/2017 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. These applications for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal arise out of a review by the Court of Appeal of sentences passed by a magistrate on the applicants after they were convicted of taking part in an unlawful assembly [1] at the Legislative Council Complex on 13 June 2014.
Cites 5 cases
|
FAMC Nos. 43 to 55 of 2017 [2018] HKCFA 13 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NOS. 43 TO 55 OF 2017 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CAAR NO. 3 OF 2016) _______________________
_______________________
_______________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _______________________ The Appeal Committee: 1.These applications for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal arise out of a review by the Court of Appeal of sentences passed by a magistrate on the applicants after they were convicted of taking part in an unlawful assembly[1] at the Legislative Council Complex on 13 June 2014. 2.We grant leave to appeal to each of the applicants confined to the ground that it is reasonably arguable that substantial and grave injustice has been done to the applicants by reason of the Court of Appeal’s departure from the principle that an offender is to be sentenced on the existing or prevailing guideline or tariff of sentence existing at the time of the commission of the offence. 3.We also grant leave to appeal to the 5th and 6th applicants on the additional ground that it is reasonably arguable that substantial and grave injustice has been done to them by reason of the Court of Appeal’s failure properly to consider section 109A of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance.[2] 4.We are otherwise satisfied that the four questions of law certified by the Court of Appeal[3] have already been fully answered in the Court’s judgment in Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung & Others[4] and, in the circumstances, we therefore refuse leave to appeal in respect of those questions. 5.We also refuse leave to appeal on the various other grounds advanced in support of the application under the substantial and grave injustice limb since they lack sufficient merit. 6.The appeals will be heard on 7 September 2018.
Mr Martin Lee SC and Mr Jeffrey Tam, instructed by Ho Tse Wai & Partners, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 11th & 12th Applicants (D3, D5, D11, D12 & D14) in FAMC 43, 44, 45, 46 & 47/2017 Mr Philip Dykes SC and Mr Douglas Kwok, instructed by Bond Ng Solicitors, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the 1st, 4th, 9th & 13th Applicants (D1, D4, D10 & D15) in FAMC 50, 52, 54 & 55/2017 Mr Hectar Pun SC and Mr Anson Wong Yu Yat, instructed by Bond Ng Solicitors, for the 2nd & 6th Applicants (D2 & D6) in FAMC 51 & 53/2017 Mr Osmond Lam and Ms Jacquelyn Ng, instructed by Sanny Kwong & Co., for the 7th & 8th Applicants (D7 & D8) in FAMC 48 & 49/2017 Mr David Leung SC, DPP, Mr Jonathan Man SADPP, Mr Derek Lau SPP and Ms Annie Li PP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent in FAMC 43-55/2017 [1] Contrary to section 18(3) of the Public Order Ordinance (Cap.245). [2] (Cap.221). [3] CAAR 3/2016, Judgment dated 14 November 2017 at [19] and [27] to [29]. [4] [2018] HKCFA 4, FACC 8-10/2017, Judgment dated 6 February 2018. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under FAMC 43/2017