Fwd Life Insurance Co (Bermuda) Ltd v. Poon Cindy

Read the full judgment text of CACV 181/2015 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 June 2019.

1. Page 16, paragraph 55: “Nor do we accept that the Judge erred in disbelieving that the Defendant would simply accept the oral representations with seeking confirmation from Mr Lee.” should read : “Nor do we accept that the Judge erred in disbelieving that the Defendant would simply accept the oral representations without seeking confirmation from Mr Lee.”

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACV 181/2015[2019] HKCA 697
Court
Court of Appeal
Date24 Jun 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 181/2015

[2019] HKCA 697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 181OF 2015

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA 2202/2008)

_____________

BETWEEN
FWD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (BERMUDA) LIMITED formerly known as
ING LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(BERMUDA) LIMITED
Plaintiff
and
POON CINDY formerly known as POON SIN MEI formerly also known as POON SIN MEI CINDY Defendant
and
CHENG WING YIU FREDDIE 1st Third Party
CHAN WING CHEUNG DANNY 2nd Third Party

_____________

Before: Hon Lam VP, Cheung and Chu JJA in Court
Date of Hearing: 30 May 2019
Date of Judgment: 24 June 2019
Date of Corrigendum: 11 July 2019

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Please note the following corrigendum for the Judgment dated the 24th day of June 2019:-

1.Page 16, paragraph 55: “Nor do we accept that the Judge erred in disbelieving that the Defendant would simply accept the oral representations with seeking confirmation from Mr Lee.” should read: “Nor do we accept that the Judge erred in disbelieving that the Defendant would simply accept the oral representations without seeking confirmation from Mr Lee.”

2.Page 17, paragraph 59: “We direct the parties to within 28 days take out a summons returnable before the Judge to seek directions on the further conduct of the determination of the remitted question.” should read: “We direct the parties to take out within 28 days a summons returnable before the Judge to seek directions on the further conduct of the determination of the remitted question.”

 
 

  (Sandy Fung)
  for Registrar, High Court