Read the full judgment text of HCPI 884/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 8 August 2022.
1. There were 3 plaintiffs in the present action. The 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd plaintiffs are respectively referred to as “ P1 ”, “ P2 ” and “ P3 ” and collectively as “ Ps ” in this Judgment. Pursuant to the order of Bharwaney J dated 6 January 2017 (see §51 below), there was to be a preliminary trial of the claims advanced by P2 and P3 against the defendant (“ D ”) on the issues of (a) false imprisonment and (b) misfeasance in public office (“ Preliminary Trial ”), and all other issues of liabilit
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case