HKSAR v. Chow Hang Tung and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 99/2023 on BabelCite. This Court of First Instance judgment was delivered on 18 March 2024 before Hon Anna Lai J.

Corrigendum to Court of First Instance judgment dated 14 March 2024, correcting 30 typographical/textual errors in HCMA 99/2023 HKSAR v. CHOW HANG TUNG AND OTHERS [2024] HKCFI 553.

Outcome: Corrigendum issued.

Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 99/2023[2024] HKCFI 553
Court
Court of First Instance
Date18 Mar 2024
JudgeHon Anna Lai J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA 99/2023

[2024] HKCFI 553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appeal against Conviction and Sentence)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 99 OF 2023

(ON APPEAL FROM WKCC 3633 OF 2021)

________________________

BETWEEN    
  HKSAR Respondent

and

  CHOW HANG TUNG (鄒幸彤) 1st Appellant
  TANG NGOK KWAN (鄧岳君) 2nd Appellant
  TSUI HON KWONG (徐漢光) 3rd Appellant

________________________

Before: Hon Anna Lai J in Court
Date of Hearing: 6 and 7 December 2023
Date of Judgment: 14 March 2024
Date of Corrigendum: 18 March 2024

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 14 March 2024:

1.In paragraph 1 on page 2, lines B – C “ At A1” should read “ A1 ”.

2.In paragraph 2 on page 2, lines G - H “ with ” should read “ both ”.


3.In paragraph 17 on page 11, lines D - E “ going ” should read “ ongoing ”.

4.In paragraph 18 on page 11, lines J - K “ HKSA ” should read “ HKSAR ”.

5.In paragraph 18 on page 11, lines O - P “ The issue to be considered in ” should read “ In ”.

6.In paragraph 19 on page 11, lines R - S “ Fik PJ ” should read “ Fok PJ”.

7.In paragraph 22(5) on page 16, lines F - G “ requiring the CP/ Secretary of Security which ” should read “ which ”.

8.In paragraph 22(6) on page 16, lines K - L “ challenging ” should read “ challenges ”.

9.In paragraph 26 on page 19, lines A - B “ In this case ” should read “ In this case the Magistrate accepted that ”.

10.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines K - L “ Magistrates ” should read “ Magistrate ”.

11.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines L - M “ office ” should read “ offence ”.

12.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines N - O “ extend ” should read “ external ”.

13.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines N - O “ national ” should read “ national security ”.

14.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines O - P “ improve ” should read “ impose ”.

15.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines P - Q “ adjective measure ” should read “ effective measures ”.

16.In paragraph 28 on page 19, lines Q - P “ intend ” should read “ intent ”.

17.In paragraph 29 on page 20, lines B - C “ require ” should read “ requirement ”.

18.In paragraph 29 on page 20, lines D - E “ CD ” should read “ CP ”.

19.In paragraph 30 on page 20, lines H - I “ agree the Magistrate that the prosecution not required” should read “ agree with the Magistrate that the prosecution is not required ”.

20.In paragraph 31 on page 20, lines R - S “ reasons be ” should read “ reasons ”.

21.In paragraph 33 on page 21, lines D - E “ The focus should be whether from the underlying informant.. ” should read “ The Respondent says the focus should be whether from the underlying information..”.

22.On page 19 - 20, paragraphs 28 - 31 should amend to paragraphs 30 - 33.

23.On page 21, paragraphs 32 - 33 should amend to paragraphs 28 - 29.

24.In paragraph 35 on page 21, lines N - O “ the HCA ” should read “ whether the HKA ”.

25.In paragraph 37 on page 22, lines B - C “ Mr Dkyes ” should read “ Mr Dykes ”.

26.In paragraph 38 on page 22, lines G - H “ passages throughout the course of the tria ” should read “ passages that throughout the course of the trial ”.

27.In paragraph 39 on page 23, lines O - P “ had some ” should read “ had ”.

28.In paragraph 41 on page 24, lines L - M “ included documents. ” should read “ include documents and retrospective. ”.

29.In paragraph 45 on page 29, lines G - H “ summits ” should read “ submits ”.

30.In paragraph 46 on page 29, lines R “ 2 years ” should read “ 6 months’ ”.

Dated the 18th day of March 2024

    (Mika Lai)
     for Registrar, High Court