Secretary for Justice v. So Ya Kau and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 262/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 October 2023.
1. Page 12, Line D, “沒有沒有” should read “沒有”.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
[English Translation – 英譯本] HCMA 262/2022 [2023] HKCFI 2647 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CASE STATED MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2022 (ON APPEAL FROM ESMP NO. 982 OF 2020) _________________
_________________
CORRIGENDUM Please note the following amendments to the Judgment handed down in the aforementioned case: 1.Page 12, Line D, “沒有沒有” should read “沒有”. 2.Page 14, Line Q, “nad” should read “and”. 3.Page 14, Line R, “So Yau Kau” should read “So Ya Kau”. 4.Page 15, Line E, “So Yau Kau” should read “So Ya Kau”. 5.Page 20, Line K, “eb” should read “be”. 6.Page 25, Line F, “及及” should read “及”.
Dated this 12th day of September 2024
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 262/2022