Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1238/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 March 2003.
1. The appellant was convicted after trial by a magistrate of one count of Theft, contrary to s. 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. He was sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment. The appellant now appeals against both conviction and sentence. On his appeal against sentence, the Appellant was represented by Mr Wilson Chan, counsel instructed by the Legal Aid Department; whereas on his appeal against conviction, he was not represented.
Cited by 12 cases · Cites 3 cases