Read the full judgment text of CACC 285/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 July 2002.
2. The defendant faced two charges in the District Court. The first charge was attempted burglary, contrary to section 11(1)(a) and (4) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. The second charge was remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration after having landed unlawfully in Hong Kong, contrary to section 38(1)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap 115. He pleaded guilty to the second charge but not guilty to the first cha
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case