曹蓉 訴 鄭陽興及另一人

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 1509/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 February 2003.

2. 第20頁B行“(5) SIP's intent was to explain...”更正為“(5) SIP Truhol 's intent was to explain...” 。

Case No.HCPI 1509/2000
Court
High Court CFI
Date26 Feb 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI001509YM/2000

HCPI1509/2000

香港特別行政區

高等法院原訟法庭

民事司法管轄權

傷亡訴訟案件編號2000年第1509號

----------------------

原告人 曹蓉
(由起訴監護人華寶興代表)
第一被告人 鄭陽興
第二被告人 律政司司長代表警務處處長

----------------------

主審法官:高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官馮驊

聆訊日期:2002年12月17至20日及2003年1月6至7日

判案書日期:2003年2月26日

-----------------

更 正 公 告

-----------------

第2頁C行“...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimation.”更正為“...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimidation.” 。

2. 第20頁B行“(5) SIP's intent was to explain...”更正為“(5) SIP Truhol's intent was to explain...” 。

3. 第26頁G行“I wish to refer further to what Lord Millet said in Three Rivers District Council, at p.48g-j :”更正為“I wish to refer further to what Lord Millett said in Three Rivers District Council, at p.48g-j :” 。

4. 第27頁Q行“...if proved at reial, are capable of establishing liability.”更正為“...if proved at trial, are capable of establishing liability.” 。

5. 第29頁J-K行“...could fail to produce grave effects under the circumstances upon any be exceptionally indifferent person,...”更正為“...could fail to produce grave effects under the circumstances upon any but an exceptionally indifferent person,...” 。

6. 第29頁M-N行“...I should gave the same answer and on the same ground a the lest question, and say it was not too remote.”更正為“...I should give the same answer and on the same ground as the last question, and say it was not too remote.” 。

2003年7月10日

( 黎達昌 )
高等法院原訟法庭馮驊暫委法官書記