Tso Yung v. Cheng Yeung Hing and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 1509/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 10 July 2003.
1. At page 2, para. 2, 2nd line: "...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimation." should be corrected as "...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimidation .".
Cited by 2 cases
|
HCPI001509M/2000 HCPI1509/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 1509 OF 2000 -------------------------
------------------------- Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Fung in Court Dates of Hearing: 17 - 20 December 2002 and 6 - 7 January 2003 Date of Handing Down Judgment: 26 February 2003 ________________ Corrigendum ________________ The following corrections were made to the English version of the judgment of this case: 1. At page 2, para. 2, 2nd line: "...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimation." should be corrected as "...and as against the 2nd defendant, the tort of intimidation.". 2. At page 20, para. 61(5), 1st line: "SIP's intent was to explain..." should be corrected as "SIP Truhol's intent was to explain...". 3. At page 26, para. 74, 1st line: "I wish to refer further to what Lord Millet said in Three Rivers District Council, at p.48g-j" should be corrected as "I wish to refer further to what Lord Millett said in Three Rivers District Council, at p.48g-j". 4. At page 27, para. 76, 18th line (8th line under "His Lordship continued at p.755G-H"): "...if proved at reial, are capable of establishing liability." should be corrected as "...if proved at trial, are capable of establishing liability.". 5. At page 29, para. 82, 3rd line: "...could fail to produce grave effects under the circumstances upon any be exceptionally indifferent person,..." should be corrected as "...could fail to produce grave effects under the circumstances upon any but an exceptionally indifferent person,...". 6. At page 29, para. 82, 11th line: "I should gave the same answer and on the same ground a the lest question, and say it was not too remote." should be corrected as "...I should give the same answer and on the same ground as the last question, and say it was not too remote.". Dated the 10th day of July 2003
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 1509/2000