Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 002488/2003 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 20 December 2004.
1. This is a case of malicious prosecution. In brief, the plaintiff was a domestic helper. An employment agency operated by the husband of the 2 nd defendant recruited her, and the 1 st defendant’s husband employed her at the family home. The employment did not last long. When it ended, the plaintiff took away with her a pair of sandals. The 1 st defendant reported to the police that the plaintiff had stolen them. The plaintiff was charged with theft. Her defence was that the 1 st defendant gav
Cited by 9 cases