Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000079/2005 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 11 January 2006.
1. The applicant was a police superintendent. He was initially charged with two counts of fraud and 8 counts of obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception under ss.16A and 18(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. It was alleged that he had failed to disclose his pre-existing liabilities and financial position when applying for loans from banks and other financial institutions and when acting as a guarantor for his daughter.
Cited by 3 cases