有關顧主強的事宜

Read the full judgment text of HCB 3394/2005 on BabelCite. This HCB judgment was delivered on 12 June 2006.

1. 由高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官陳江耀就上述案件所頒下的判案書內有以下更正,敬請留意:

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCB 3394/2005
Court
HCB
Date12 Jun 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCB 3394/2005

香港特別行政區

高等法院原訟法庭

民事司法管轄權

高院破產案件編號2005年第3394號

____________

有關顧主強(欠債人)的事宜

有關債權人星展銀行(香港)有限公司前經營道亨銀行有限公司的單方面申請

____________

主審法官:高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官陳江耀

審訊日期:2006年1月25日、5月25日、5月29日及6月9日

宣判日期:2006年6月12日

判案書日期:2006年6月12日

1.由高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官陳江耀就上述案件所頒下的判案書內有以下更正,敬請留意:

(1)     於第1段區域法院案件編號應為DCCJ 2809/2003而非DCCJ 209/2003。

(2)     第2段,顧先生向區域法院申請要求銀行就狀書的內容提供42項更詳盡清楚的資料而非24項。

(3)     第45段,有關《私隱條例》第58條 (1) 和 (2) 款的有關部分的英文版遺漏,如下:

“(1)   Personal data held for the purposes of :

(d)   the prevention, preclusion or remedying (including punishment) of unlawful or seriously improper conduct, or dishonesty or malpractice, by persons;

(e)   the prevention or preclusion of significant financial loss arising from :

(ii)   unlawful or seriously improper conduct, or dishonesty or malpractice, by persons;

are exempt from the provisions of data protection principle 6 and section 18(1)(b) where the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to :

(i)    prejudice any of the matters referred to in this subsection; or

(ii)   directly or indirectly identify the person who is the source of the data.

(2)   Personal data are exempt from the provisions of data protection principle 3 in any case in which-

(a)    the use of the data is for any of the purposes referred to in subsection (1) (and whether or not the data are held for any of those purposes); and

(b)    the application of those provisions in relation to such use would be likely to prejudice any of the matters referred to in that subsection,

and in any proceedings against any person for a contravention of any of those provisions it shall be a defence to show that he had reasonable grounds for believing that failure to so use the data would have been likely to prejudice any of those matters.”

(4)     第12、43、56及58段,銀行的代表和證人名字王勝,實為黃勝之誤。

日期:2006年6月27日

  (莊啟斌代行)
原訟法庭暫委法官陳江耀書記

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment