(d) the prevention, preclusion or remedying (including punishment) of unlawful or seriously improper conduct, or dishonesty or malpractice, by persons;
(e) the prevention or preclusion of significant financial loss arising from :
…
(ii) unlawful or seriously improper conduct, or dishonesty or malpractice, by persons;
…
are exempt from the provisions of data protection principle 6 and section 18(1)(b) where the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to :
(i) prejudice any of the matters referred to in this subsection; or
(ii) directly or indirectly identify the person who is the source of the data.
(2) Personal data are exempt from the provisions of data protection principle 3 in any case in which-
(a) the use of the data is for any of the purposes referred to in subsection (1) (and whether or not the data are held for any of those purposes); and
(b) the application of those provisions in relation to such use would be likely to prejudice any of the matters referred to in that subsection,
and in any proceedings against any person for a contravention of any of those provisions it shall be a defence to show that he had reasonable grounds for believing that failure to so use the data would have been likely to prejudice any of those matters.”
(4) 第12、43、56及58段,銀行的代表和證人名字王勝,實為黃勝之誤。
日期:2006年6月27日
(莊啟斌代行)
原訟法庭暫委法官陳江耀書記
Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error