Read the full judgment text of CACC 000055/1997 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 June 1998.
1. The respondent originally faced five charges in the District Court. Four of those charges were for evasion of liability by deception contrary to s.18B(1)(b) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap.210, and one was for using a false instrument contrary s.73 of the Crimes Ordinance Cap.200.