Read the full judgment text of FACV 000019/2005 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 6 December 2006.
1. Where land could not have been put to Melhado use without section 16 permission, is the need for such permission to be taken into account when compensation for the resumption of the land is assessed on the basis of such use? By “ Melhado use” I mean the sort of use left open by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Attorney General v. Melhado Investment Ltd [1983] HKLR 327. And by “section 16 permission” I mean permission of the Town Planning Board (“the Board”) granted under s.16 of the T
Cited by 11 cases