Ng Jack Fong v. Ng Chan Ning
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 2830/2005 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 19 March 2007.
1. The penultimate sentence of paragraph 159 of the Reasons for Decision should read as follows: “But the Plaintiff Purchaser did not make such payment even as at 31 st January 2007.”
Cited by 5 cases
|
DCCJ2830/2005 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO. 2830 OF 2005 ------------------------ BETWEEN
------------------------ Coram: H H Judge Marlene Ng in Chambers (Open to the Public) Date of Hearing: 1st February, 2007 Date of Decision: 2nd February, 2007 Date of Handing Down Reasons for Decision: 7th February, 2007 ------------------------ CORRIGENDUM ------------------------ 1.The penultimate sentence of paragraph 159 of the Reasons for Decision should read as follows: “But the Plaintiff Purchaser did not make such payment even as at 31st January 2007.” 2.Paragraph 164(c) of the Reasons for Decision should read as follows: “the Plaintiff do forthwith and not later than 1:00pm on Saturday 3rd January February 2007 notify DBS ……” Dated the 19th day of March 2007.
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 2830/2005