Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000251/2006 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Applicant claims against the 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent for employees' compensation under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance, Cap. 282 ("the Ordinance"). The Applicant's case is that the 1st Respondent is his direct employer, that the 1st Respondent is the sub-contractor of the 2nd Respondent and hence the 2nd Respondent is also liable to him under Section 24 of the Ordinance as the principal contractor of the 1st Respondent.
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 3 cases