Shenzhen Kai Long Investment and Development Co Ltd v. Cec Electrical Manufacturing (International) Co Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1885/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 October 2003.
1. Page 19, paragraph 26: in line 5, “over two years” should be replaced with “ almost two years ”. The sentence should read “However, following extensive negotiations for almost two years , the Mainland and Hong Kong entered into an Arrangement on the Reciprocal Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter ‘Arrangement’).”
Cites 1 case
|
[English Translation – 英譯本] HCMP 1885/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1885 OF 2000 -------------------------------------
------------------------------------- BETWEEN
------------------------------------- Before: Hon A Cheung J in Court Dates of Hearing: 14, 15, 27 and 28 August 2003 Date of Judgment: 30 October 2003 ------------------------ CORRIGENDUM ------------------------ Pursuant to the Corrigendum issued on 19 March 2004 in respect of the Judgment handed down by The Hon Mr. Justice A Cheung on 30 October 2003, the following corresponding corrections are to be made to the English translation of the said Judgment: 1.Page 19, paragraph 26: in line 5, “over two years” should be replaced with “almost two years”. The sentence should read “However, following extensive negotiations for almost two years, the Mainland and Hong Kong entered into an Arrangement on the Reciprocal Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter ‘Arrangement’).” 2.Page 35, paragraph 36: at the end of the last line, “paragraph H2/1” should be replaced with “paragraph H2/0 et. seq.”. 3.Page 42, paragraph 46: “in early 2000” in line 1 and “the same year” in lines 2 and 3 should be replaced with “on 21 June 1999” and “early 2000” respectively. The sentence should read “Furthermore, the Arrangement was entered into on 21 June 1999 and the consequential amendments to the Ordinance were made in early 2000. By that time, the Arbitration Law, which came into effect on 1 September 1995, had been in force for quite some time.” 4.Page 42, paragraph 47: in line 4, “2000” should be replaced with “1999”.
Translated by Mr. Edmund Cham, Solicitor. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1885/2000