Read the full judgment text of CACC 106/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 June 2009.
1. The Applicant was charged with 38 counts of “theft”, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance (Cap. 210 of the Laws of Hong Kong), and one count of “furnishing false information”, contrary to section 19(1)(b) of the Theft Ordinance.
Cites 4 cases