Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000409/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 December 2009.
1. The appellant was convicted after trial at Shatin Magistracy of two offences of attempting to export goods to which a forged trademark was applied, contrary to section 12 (1) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362 (“the Ordinance”) and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200 (being Charges 1 and 4); and two offences of possession of goods for sale, trade or manufacture to which a forged trademark was applied, contrary to section 9(2) of the Ordinance (being Charges 2 and 3).