Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000765/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The appellant was convicted by S Smout, Esquire, after trial, of a single charge of criminal intimidation contrary to s. 24(c)(i) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200: the charge was amended to reflect that section by the magistrate, it originally having referred to s. 24(a)(i). The appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 18 months. He appeals both conviction and sentence.
Cited by 8 cases