HKSAR v. Tsui Chi Wah

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 14/2010 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 March 2010.

Cited by 6 cases

Case No.HCCC 14/2010
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Mar 2010
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC14/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 14 OF 2010

----------------------

  HKSAR  
  v.  
  Tsui Chi-Wah  

----------------------

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge Andrew Chan

Date:

3 March 2010 at 10.11 am

Present:

Ms Laura Ng, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Ms Suzanne Sim, instructed by S H Chan & Co, assigned by Director of Legal Aid, for the accused

Offence:

Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

-------------------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

-------------------------------------------

COURT: The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance. He was committed to this court for sentence.

The Summary of Facts which was admitted by the defendant revealed the following: on 17 May 2009 the defendant was intercepted by police officers at Lo Wu Railway Station.

Inside his handbag the police found a total of approximately 1.69 kilograms of ketamine. The defendant was arrested and cautioned.

In a later subsequent record of interview the defendant admitted that he was asked by a male to take the drug from Shenzhen to Hong Kong for $4,000. The defendant acted as a courier to bring drugs across the border.

The guidelines in sentencing are to be found in the case of The Secretary of Justice v Hii Siew Cheng CAAR7/2006. The starting point for trafficking in over 1 kilogram of ketamine is 14 years upwards.

In HKSAR v Law Siu Fai HCCC122/2009 a starting point of 15 years was adopted in relation to trafficking 1.287 kilograms of ketamine.

In HKSAR v Kwok Tung HCCC158/2009 a starting point of 15 years was also adopted in relation to trafficking in 1.236 kilograms of ketamine.

In HKSAR v Abdallah Anwar Abbas CACC304/2008 the Court of Appeal gives further guidelines on trafficking large quantities of heroin. Having perused that case, I am of the view that the same principle could also be adopted and modified in the present case.

Adopting the same logic I am of the decision that the appropriate sentence for trafficking between 1 kilogram and 2 kilograms of ketamine the starting point should be in the range of 14 to 17 years’ imprisonment. Thus the starting point for trafficking 1.69 kilograms of ketamine in the present case should therefore be set at 16 years’ imprisonment.

The only mitigation in this case is the defendant’s plea at its earliest opportunity, he will be given the usual one‑third discount.

For the sole offence, the defendant stands convicted, he is sentenced to 10 years and 8 months’ imprisonment.