Read the full judgment text of HCMP 641/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 January 2011.
1. The dispute in the present case is about a legal charge executed by the first and second defendants. They both argued that the legal charge is legally invalid by reason that it was executed by them in circumstances where they had respectively been misled and subjected to undue influence, and that after their execution the bank had varied the terms and amount of the loan facility.
Cites 1 case