HKSAR v. Tran Viet Thanh

Read the full judgment text of CACC 54/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 January 2012.

1. Page 7, Paragraph 9(2): “15 months’ imprisonment, six months of which to be served consecutively to the first sentence.” should read as “15 months’ imprisonment, six months of which to be served concurrently with the first sentence.”; and

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 54/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date17 Jan 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 54/2011
CACC 221/2011
HCMA 360/2011
(HEARD TOGETHER)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2011

(On Appeal From District Court Criminal Case No. 1354 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

HKSAR Respondent
and
TRAN VIET THANH Applicant

________________________

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 221 OF 2011

(On Appeal From District Court Criminal Case No. 407 OF 2011)

BETWEEN

HKSAR Respondent
and
NGUYEN THI PHU Applicant

________________________

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 360 OF 2011

(On Appeal From STCC No. 1682 OF 2011)

BETWEEN

HKSAR Respondent
and
GUAN CUIZHEN (關翠珍) Appellant

Before : Hon Cheung, Chu JJA and Barnes J in Court

Date of Hearing : 17 January 2012

Date of Judgment : 17 January 2012

Date of Reasons for Judgment : 20 January 2012

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D A

-------------------------------

Kindly note the following corrections in the Reasons for Judgment dated 20 January 2012: -

1. Page 7, Paragraph 9(2): “15 months’ imprisonment, six months of which to be served consecutively to the first sentence.” should read as “15 months’ imprisonment, six months of which to be served concurrently with the first sentence.”; and

2.  Page 16, Paragraph 18: “He ordered the first sentence to be altered to 12 months and three months of which was to be served consecutively to the second sentence of 18 months.” should read as “He ordered the first sentence to be altered to 12 months and three months of which was to be served consecutively to the second sentence of 15 months.”

Dated this 6th March, 2012

    (Candy Lau)(Ms)
  Clerk to Hon. Cheung, JA