Read the full judgment text of CACC 301/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 10 August 2012.
1. The applicant appeared for trial together with two other defendants before HH Judge P Li in the District Court. By Charges 1 – 3, the prosecution alleged that the applicant had managed three separate vice establishments in Mong Kok, known respectively as Prince Silver Spring Sauna (S1), Prince Sauna (S2), and Prince City Sauna (S3), contrary to section 139(1)(b) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. Although the time frames alleged in the three charges were different, each charge concerned a di
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case