Read the full judgment text of CACV 62/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 June 2013.
1. This is the respondent’s appeal (pursuant to leave granted by two other judges of this Court) against the judgment of Deputy District Court Judge Carlson who refused his application to stay the present proceedings commenced by the applicant (‘the relocation application’) as being conducted in an inappropriate jurisdiction (‘the jurisdictional challenge’). The respondent contended Singapore rather than Hong Kong is the appropriate jurisdiction. The applicant invoked the relocation application
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case