HKSAR v. Hoang, Thi Phuong
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 396/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 September 2013.
1. This Appellant, a woman in her mid-40s, pleaded guilty in the Magistrates’ Court to two charges. Charge 1 was of remaining without authority after having landed unlawfully, contrary to s.38(1)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115. Its particulars read:
Cited by 3 cases
|
HCMA 396/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 396 OF 2013 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 1753 OF 2013) ____________
_______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.This Appellant, a woman in her mid-40s, pleaded guilty in the Magistrates’ Court to two charges. Charge 1 was of remaining without authority after having landed unlawfully, contrary to s.38(1)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115. Its particulars read:
Charge 2 was of using a forged identity card, contrary to s.7A(1) of the Registration of Persons Ordinance, Cap.117. Its particulars read:
2.The Brief Facts of the case which the Appellant admitted read as follows:
3.Three perfected grounds of appeal against sentence have been filed in the Appellant’s behalf. They read as follows:
4.The Magistrate’s reasons for making the sentences wholly consecutive appear in para. 7 of her Reasons for Sentence where she says:
5.Where the possession of a forged identity card or an identity card belonging to another person is for the purpose of remaining in Hong Kong without authority after having landed unlawfully, wholly concurrent sentences of 15 months’ imprisonment would be appropriate. But where the identity card is used to obtain employment, it would be appropriate to impose a total in excess of 15 months’ imprisonment. An appropriate way in which to achieve such a total would be to pass a sentence of a duration longer than 15 months’ imprisonment for the identity card offence and make it wholly concurrent with a sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment for the offence of remaining without authority after having landed unlawfully. 6.In the present case, the forged identity card was used by the Appellant to obtain employment. 7.All things considered, I regard a total sentence of 18 months’ imprisonment to be appropriate, and I propose to achieve that total in the following way. The sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment for remaining without authority after having landed unlawfully will stand. The sentence for the identity card offence will be increased to 18 months’ imprisonment. The two sentences will be made wholly concurrent. 8.I regard this result as in conformity with the decision of the Court of Appeal case of HKSAR v. Tran Viet Thanh[2012] 12HKLRD903 and do not accept the submissions, made on behalf of the Appellant with a view to obtaining an even greater reduction in sentence, that what the Court said was merely in passing and does not actually establish the level of sentencing. 9.The appeal against sentence is allowed so as to sentence the Appellant in the foregoing way, thus reducing her total sentence from 30 months’ imprisonment to 18 months’ imprisonment.
Ms Sezen Chong, instructed by Rowdget W Young & Co and assigned by the Legal Aid Department, for the appellant Ms Winnie Mok, of Department of Justice, for the respondent | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case