The dispute arose from a joint venture between the Lams (acting through High Fashion Apparel Ltd) and Mary Leong Ma Li (acting through Hansen International Ltd). In November 2013, they incorporated High Fashion New Media Corporation Ltd, which in turn formed Longford Information and Technology Co Ltd as its wholly owned Mainland operating subsidiary; a Shanghai bank account (the Longford account) was opened for joint venture purposes. The Lams alleged that Leong breached an agreed protocol governing the handling of funds in the Longford account. In October 2014, HFA commenced a derivative action on behalf of New Media against Leong, and in December 2014, Chow J granted an interlocutory injunction restraining her from operating the account except in accordance with the protocol.
New judgments
15 Sep to 21 Sep 2025
Court of Final Appeal
Court of Appeal
2016年9月26日，原告人發出傳訊令狀，申索陳述書有關其強積金事宜，並要求第一及第二被告人賠償他聲稱的強積金損失HK$ 669,917.34丶精神傷害損失HK$ 6,000億及訟費HK$ 103,045。
On 16 May 2025, this court handed down a judgment ( [2025] HKCA 425 ) dismissing the applicant’s appeal against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Michael Wong given on 18 March 2025 dismissing his application for leave to apply for judicial review.
第一申請人 (「父親」)及第二申請人(「母親」) 為夫妻(二人合稱「父母親」)。第三至第五申請人(分別為「長子」、「次子」及「三子」，合稱「三名兒子」)是他們三位未成年的兒子。
The appellant applies before me for bail pending the determination of his appeal, having already been granted leave to appeal against his sentence by Zervos JA on 14 July 2025, sitting as a Single Judge of the Court of Appeal. The respondent does not oppose the present application on the merits, given the granting of leave, but submits that it may not ultimately make any significant difference to the appellant’s sentence, considering his role and culpability. Much may depend on when the Court
This is the plaintiffs’ renewed application for leave to appeal against the Order dated 28 March 2024 (“ the Order ”) made by the Deputy District Judge Lawrence KF Ng (“ the Judge ”) after trial.