New judgments

Leong Ma Li and the Lam family entered into a joint venture in November 2013 to develop an e-commerce platform, forming High Fashion New Media Corporation Ltd ("New Media") with HFA holding 65% and Hansen's Leong holding 35%. New Media wholly owned Longford Information and Technology Co Ltd in Shanghai, which maintained an ICBC capital account. Controversies arose in 2014 regarding the operation of the ICBC capital account, with the Lams alleging an arrangement ("the Protocol") requiring multiple signatures for transactions. On 5 December 2014, Chow J granted an injunction restraining Leong from dealing with the ICBC capital account except in accordance with the Protocol. Leong was found guilty of contempt in 2017 for earlier breaches. After October 2017, Leong resigned as Longford's chairman, handed her seal to Tong (Longford's financial controller), and instructed Tong to seek approval from both shareholders for expenses. New Media brought second contempt proceedings alleging further breaches by Tong's operation of the account between April 2016 and July 2020, totalling approximately RMB 64.7 million.

This appeal is brought by the plaintiff, Zhang Allie, against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Le Pichon on 9 April 2025 (“ Decision ”) [1] . By the Decision, the judge dismissed the originating summons of the plaintiff seeking, inter alia , (1) a declaration that the documents submitted for filing on 10 July 2023 and 9 July 2024 with the Companies Registry (“ CR ”) in respect of the 2 nd defendant, Blep Technologies (HK) Limited (“ the Company ”), set out in the schedule to the ori

On 19 January 2026, the applicant filed a Notice of Appeal to appeal the decision given by Deputy High Court Judge Lung (“the Judge”) on 7 January 2026 refusing his application for leave to apply for judicial review ( [2026] HKCFI 78 ). The intended judicial review is against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”) dated 15 May 2025 dismissing the applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration (“the Director”) dated 27 February 2025 which reje

本案類屬俗稱「寶藥黨」的街頭騙案，共涉四名被告（「 D1 」至「 D4 」）、兩項欺詐罪（「 控罪一 」及「 控罪二 」） [1] 及一項盜竊罪。 [2]

The applicant was charged with conspiracy to traffic in dangerous drugs, namely heroin hydrochloride and ketamine, between a date unknown in July 2020 and 30 September 2020, contrary to sections 4(1)(a), (3) and 39 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap 134 and sections 159A and 159C of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. On 19 December 2022, she pleaded guilty to the charge before a magistrate, as a result of which she was duly committed to the High Court for sentence. Having confirmed her plea on

本庭於2026年2月13日的判案書中作出暫准訟費命令，判令原告人須付第一被告人的訟費52000元。其後原告人申請更改暫准命令，並提出兩項理由：（一）訟費金額極度不成比例且不合理；（二）原告人作為長者及無律師代表訴訟人的極端困苦。