Read the full judgment text of FCMC 7017/2014 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 29 April 2020 before 區域法院暫委法官蘇嘉賢.
Ancillary Relief – Matrimonial Proceedings – Disclosure of Assets – Sharing Principle – Child Maintenance – District Court – Parties failed to make full and honest disclosure of assets – Court applied sharing principle but did not order equal division due to non-disclosure – Child maintenance set at HK$3 million – Court funds and matrimonial home proceeds split equally after child maintenance – Other assets remain with respective owners – No costs order – Both parties appeared in person – Husband 78 years old, Wife 54 years old – Marriage 1997 to 2011 – One son born 2002 – Son studying in UK – Husband retired, Wife has earning capacity – Assets include properties in HK and Mainland China – Business interests in fashion industry
Legal issues: Disclosure of assets · Business operations and income · Asset allocation · Child maintenance
Outcome: Ancillary relief granted. Court funds split. Matrimonial home proceeds split after child maintenance. Other assets remain with respective owners. No costs order.
Cited by 3 cases