Read the full judgment text of FCMC 16405/2018 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 23 September 2022 before 彭家光.
Family law – Custody and access – Best interests of the child – Special needs child – Autism and intellectual disability – Joint custody vs sole custody – Supervised access – Boarding school arrangement – Social welfare report – Clinical psychologist report – Conflict between parents – Stability and routine – Mother as primary caregiver – Father's hygiene concerns – Medical treatment disputes – Court order for sole custody to mother – Access at contact centre – Boarding at school supported – No costs order – Interim order to become absolute.
Legal issues: Custody of son · Access arrangements · Boarding school arrangement
Outcome: Mother granted sole custody, care and control of the son. Father granted access at contact centre. No costs order.
Cites 1 case