Read the full judgment text of CACC 233/2021 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 May 2022.
1. The respondent was convicted after trial on “Charge 2”, namely, “wounding with intent” [1] among the five charges he faced before HH Judge Sham (“the trial judge”) in the District Court, but was found not guilty for the remaining charges, including “common assault” [2] (“Charge 1”), “causing grievous bodily harm by dangerous driving” (“Charge 3”, an alternative to “Charge 2”) [3] , “failing to stop after an accident whereby personal injury was caused to a person” (“Charge 4”) [4] , and “faili
Cited by 1 case · Cites 3 cases