HKSAR v. Best Pencil (Hong Kong) Limited and Others
Read the full judgment text of DCCC 265/2022 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 29 August 2024.
1. Paragraph 20, line 2 “13…articles (namely A2 to A13) should read “12…articles (namely A2 to A13)”
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case
|
[English Translation – 英譯本] DCCC 265/2022 [2024] HKDC 1430 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 265 OF 2022 ____________________
____________________
__________________________ CORRIGENDUM __________________________ Please note the following corrigenda in the Reasons for Verdict handed down on 29 August 2024: 1.Paragraph 20, line 2 “13…articles (namely A2 to A13) should read “12…articles (namely A2 to A13)” 2.Paragraph 91, line 6 in Chinese 「批準」 should read 「批准」[1] 3.Paragraph 115, line 2 in Chinese「……採用那方式 ……」should read 「……採用哪方式 ……」[2] 4.Paragraph 115, line 3 in Chinese 「有間」should read 「有關」[3] 5.Paragraph 166, line 6 “Publication” should read “Publications” 6.Paragraph 166, line 8 in Chinese 「立法會」should read 「立法局」[4] 7.Paragraph 169, line 2 “Publication” should read “Publications” 8.Paragraph 169, line 6 “the Scretary of Scretary” should read “the Secretary of State” 9.Paragraph 171, line 15 “Publication” should read “Publications” 10.Paragraph 173, line 10 “Publication” should read “Publications” 11.Paragraph 235, line 3 in Chinese 「惑不能」should read 「或不能」[5] 12.Paragraph 235, line 5 in Chinese「... …不一定得出... …」should read「... …不一定得到... …」[6] 13.Paragraph 238, line 1 in Chinese 「圖藤」 should read 「圖騰」[7] 14.Paragraph 259, line 11 in Chinese 「期後」should read 「其後」[8] 15.Paragraph 261, lines 11 “don’t know how to say” should read “don’t know/hard to say” 16.Paragraph 282, line 8 “he only needed to” should read “he needed to” 17.Paragraph 286, line 4 in Chinese 「我平時……」 should read 「平時……」[9] 18.Paragraph 344, line 6 “Twomwy” should read “Twomey” 19.Paragraph 354, line 3 「執法須要」 should read 「執法需要」[10] 20.Paragraph 361, line 20 “he” should read “she”; line 21 “him” should read “her” 21.Paragraph 361, line 10 in Chinese 「批準」 should read 「批准」[11] 22.Paragraph 361, line 27 “his” should read “her” 23.Paragraph 369, line 8 in Chinese 「……其實：」 should read 「……其實說：」[12] 24.Paragraph 391, line 1 in Chinese 「手則」should read 「守則」[13] 25.Paragraph 401, line 4 “as” should read “or” 26.Paragraph 439, line 3 “15 January 2015” should read “19 January 2015” 27.Paragraph 448, line 3 in Chinese 「廻避」should read 「迴避」[14] 28.Paragraph 462, line 4 in Chinese 「施擊」should read 「施襲」[15] 29.Paragraph 463, line 4 in Chinese 「兩批.人」should read「兩批人」[16] 30.Paragraph 488, lines 7 & 8 “Local Newspapers Ordinance” should read “Registration of Local Newspapers Ordinance” Dated the 14th day of October 2024
[1] Translator’s note: this amendment does not affect the English version [2] -ditto- [3] -ditto- [4] Translator’s note: this amendment does not affect the English version [5] - ditto - [6] - ditto - [7] - ditto - [8] Translator’s note: this amendment does not affect the English version [9] - ditto - [10] - ditto - [11] - ditto - [12] - ditto - [13] - ditto - [14] - ditto - [15] - ditto - [16] Translator’s note: this amendment does not affect the English version |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 265/2022