Peking University Resources (Holdings) Company Ltd v. Peking University Resources Group Co., Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1470/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 June 2025.

1. The “1 st , 3 rd and 4 th Defendants’ case” in page 34, paragraph 92 should be “1 st , 2 nd and 4 th Defendants’ case”.

Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1470/2022[2025] HKCFI 2642
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Jun 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1470/2022

[2025] HKCFI 2642

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1470 OF 2022

____________

BETWEEN    
  PEKING UNIVERSITY RESOURCES (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff
 

and

 
  PEKING UNIVERSITY RESOURCES GROUP CO., LTD
(北大資源集團有限公司)
1st Defendant
  ZENG GANG (曾剛) 2nd Defendant
  CHEUNG SHUEN LUNG (張旋龍) 3rd Defendant
  WANG TAO (王濤) 4th Defendant

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Alan Kwong in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Hearing: 11 June 2025
Date of Decision: 23 June 2025
Date of Corrigendum: 8 July 2025

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following corrigendum for the decision dated 8 July 2025:-

1.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants’ case” in page 34, paragraph 92 should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants’ case”.

2.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants” in page 34, paragraph 93 should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants”.

3.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants” in page 37, paragraph 102 should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants”.

4.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants’ expert” in page 39, paragraph 108(2) should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants’ expert”.

5.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants’ case” in page 41, paragraph 109 should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants’ case”.

6.The “1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants” in page 48, paragraph 137(2) should be “1st, 2nd and 4th Defendants”.

  (Queenie Chan)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Alan Kwong