HKSAR v. L.C.L. and Others
Read the full judgment text of CACC 193/2021 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 November 2023.
1. Lines M to N, paragraph 115, page 40 [1] should read “We are of the view that the starting point for them in respect of Charge 1 should be imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months.”
Cites 3 cases
|
[English Translation - 英譯本] CACC 193/2021 and CAAR 13/2021, [2023] HKCA 1301 From：[2021] HKCFI 2818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 193 OF 2021 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 126 of 2020) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL APPLICATION FOR REVIEW NO. 13 OF 2021 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 126 of 2020) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ (Heard Together)
________________________ Corrigendum ________________________ Please note the following corrections to the Reasons for Judgment handed down by the Hon Madam Justice Poon of the Court of Appeal in this case on 27 November 2023: 1.Lines M to N, paragraph 115, page 40 [1] should read “We are of the view that the starting point for them in respect of Charge 1 should be imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months.” 2.Lines F to H, paragraph 125, page 46[2] should read “Regarding D3 and D4, on the basis of a sentence review, this court will give a 1-year reduction by discretion. The two were discharged in March and April 2022 respectively, a 6-month reduction will be given by further discretion. Therefore, the sentence on Charge 1 is amended to a prison term of 6 years.” Dated this 27th day of November 2023.
Translated by the Court Language Section of the Judiciary and vetted by Mr Walter Lee, solicitor. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 193/2021