HKSAR v. Cheng Sum

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 805/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 November 2000.

1. This appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty on one charge of publishing an obscene article and one charge of possession of an obscene article for the purpose of publication. He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 16 months' imprisonment on each charge. He now appeals against the sentence on the grounds that the sentence was too severe and excessive. In sentencing the appellant, the magistrate said this:

Cited by 5 cases

Case No.HCMA 805/2000[2000] 1 HKLRD 405
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Nov 2000
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000805/2000

HCMA805/2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 805 OF 2000

(On appeal from Eastern Magistracy Case No. ESCC2836/2000)

---------------------

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
CHENG SUM Appellant

---------------------

Coram: Hon V Bokhary, J in Court

Date of hearing: 14 November 2000

Date of judgment: 14 November 2000

---------------------

J U D G M E N T

---------------------

1. This appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty on one charge of publishing an obscene article and one charge of possession of an obscene article for the purpose of publication. He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 16 months' imprisonment on each charge. He now appeals against the sentence on the grounds that the sentence was too severe and excessive. In sentencing the appellant, the magistrate said this:

"The defendant admitted the offences involving a total of 3,151 discs. The offences are extremely prevalent and the location of the offences is notorious for this type of offence and offences involving pirated discs. The defendant had a total of 40 previous convictions, including 6 for similar offences. The defendant was considered by me to be a persistent offender which was an aggravating factor, c.f. HKSAR v. Ng Chi-man 1999 1 HKL 632.

In the circumstances, given the large quantity of discs involved, I took 2 years as the starting point and reduced it by one-third for the defendant's plea. I imposed a sentence of 16 months imprisonment on each charge to run concurrently."

2. In all the circumstances of this case, I consider that the sentence passed by the magistrate, although on the high side, is one with which I cannot properly interfere. The appeal against sentence is therefore dismissed.

(V Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Mr Nelson Lam, instructed by the Legal Aid Department, for the Appellant

Mr A A Bruce, SC, SADPP, leading Miss Vinci Lam, GC of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

I/we certify that to the best of our ability and skill, the foregoing is a true transcript of the audio recording of the above proceedings

................................................
J Paterson

Date: 7 December, 2000