Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000003/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 November 2004.
1. On 10 May 2004, the respondent was convicted of seven offences of using a document as an agent with intent to deceive his principal, contrary to section 9(3) (and punishable under section 12(1)) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201 ("Cap. 201"). This followed a trial in the District Court before Deputy Judge A. Wong. Sentencing was adjourned until 22 May 2004 when concurrent terms of twelve months' imprisonment suspended for two years were imposed on each charge.
Cited by 7 cases · Cites 5 cases