Secretary for Justice v. Choy Bing Wing
Read the full judgment text of CACV 11/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 1 March 2005 before Stuart-Moore VP, Yeung JA & Burrell J.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal to Court of Final Appeal – certificate under s 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap 484 – contempt proceedings instituted by Secretary for Justice – applicant's application to strike out contempt proceedings dismissed by Chief Judge – appeal to Court of Appeal dismissed on 3 December 2004 – applicant seeking leave to appeal to CFA and s 32(2) certificate – whether proposed appeal involves question or point of law of great and/or general public importance – held, applicant failed to identify any such question or point of law – no reason to submit any question or point of law to the Court of Final Appeal – requirements for leave and certificate not satisfied – application refused with costs – applicant in person – Mr Gerald McCoy SC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent.
Legal issues: Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal and/or a certificate under s 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap 484 should be granted
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal (and for a s 32(2) certificate) refused; applicant to pay costs.
Cited by 21 cases
|
CACV 11/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM hcmp nO. 4694 OF 2003) _______________________ BETWEEN
______________________
Before: Hon Stuart-Moore VP, Yeung JA & Burrell J in Court Date of Hearing: 1 March 2005 Date of Judgment: 1 March 2005
______________________ J U D G M E N T ______________________
Hon Yeung JA (giving Judgment of the Court): 1.On 3 December 2004, we rejected Mr Choy’s appeal against the order of the Chief Judge dismissing his application to strike out the contempt proceedings instituted by the Secretary for Justice. 2.Mr Choy now seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against our decision. We take Mr Choy’s application also as an application for a certificate under s 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap 484. 3.To succeed on his application on either limb, Mr Choy must persuade us that his proposed appeal involves a question or a point of law of great and/or general public importance, or that there are other reasons to submit such point to the Court of Final Appeal. 4.Mr Choy has not identified any question or point of law of great and/or general public importance. We can think of no reason to submit any question or point of law to the Court of Final Appeal. 5.We have considered the background of the case and everything urged upon us by Mr Choy, both orally and in written form. We are not persuaded that the requirements set out in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal have been met. 6.We therefore refuse Mr Choy’s application with costs.
Applicant: In person Mr Gerald McCoy SC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent. Appellant: In person. Mr Gerald McCoy SC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent. |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 11/2004