HKSAR v. Kwok Chun Leung, Kelvin

Case No.DCCC 145/2009
Court
District Court
Date21 Apr 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%

DCCC 145/2009

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 145 OF 2009

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  KWOK Chun-leung, Kelvin (Defendant)

________________________

Before:  Deputy District Judge Eddie Yip

Date: 21 April 2009 at 2:45pm

Present:

Mr. William Siu, Public Prosecutor for HKSAR
Mr. Paul Francis, of M/S Tang, Wong & Cheung, for defendant

Charge: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

__________________

Reasons for Sentence

__________________

The charge and facts

1.The defendant pleads guilty to the charge of trafficking in a dangerous drug.  In the evening of 20 November 2008, the police found the Defendant suspicious when he was leaving the building situated at No. 405 Nathan Road at about 10:22 p.m.  They followed him until he suddenly fled.  They chased up and stopped him.  A body search on him revealed one transparent bag containing white substance inside the front pocket of his trousers.  After arrest and caution, he said someone had given him HK$500 for taking it to a black vehicle at the “Element”.  The government chemist certified that it contained 27.11 grammes of a solid containing 18.35 grammes of cocaine.  

Mitigation

2.The Defendant is 25 years of age.  He has received F. 2 education in Hong Kong.  He has done various unskilled casual jobs.  He lives with his mother and younger brother.  His father has divorced with his mother.  He has, among others, 1 previous conviction for possession of a dangerous drug in 2008.  He committed the present offence because he did not earn enough for his living expenses.   

The sentencing guidelines

3.In Attorney General v Rojas [1994] 1 HKC 342, Silke VP equated the impact of cocaine with heroin.  The sentencing guidelines in R v Lau Tak-ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370 would be directly applicable as follows:

(1)Below 10 grammes of heroin, 2 to 5 years’ imprisonment;

(2)10 to 50 grammes, 5 to 8 years

(3)50 to 200 grammes, 8 to 12 years

(4)400 to 600 grammes, 15 to 20 years

(5)over 600 grammes, 20 years upwards.

The sentence I pass

4.The charge involved 18.35 grammes of grammes.  It falls within the range of 5 to 8 years’ imprisonment according to Lau Tak-ming (supra).  I do not regard any other sentencing options appropriate.  The Defendant was a courier.  I take a starting point of 5 years and 6 months.  I give a one-third discount for the plea of guilty.  There are no other mitigating factors.  The sentence is 3 years and 8 months. 

  EDDIE YIP
DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE

Related Cases
Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first

HKSAR v. So Kin Wai

DCCC 96/2012 · District Court
07 Mar 2012
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Yung Tak Chun

DCCC 1015/2011 · District Court
18 Nov 2011
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Wong Ho Yin

DCCC 829/2011 · District Court
24 Oct 2011
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Chun King Fung

DCCC 506/2011 · District Court
31 Aug 2011
2 shared citations