HKSAR v. Xu Yuzhen
Read the full judgment text of DCCC 359/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 7 September 2009.
1. When the facts fulfilled the element of importation, whether the drugs are intended for personal consumption is a matter that goes to mitigation rather than a requisite element to determine guilt ( Chan Mung Lung [1992] 2 HKCLR 127; Chung Kam Fai [1993] 1 HKCLR 178; and Hiroyuki Sato [1994] 1 HKCLR 119).
Cites 3 cases
|
DCCC 359/2009 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 359 OF 2009 -----------------
-----------------
Reasons for Sentence 1.When the facts fulfilled the element of importation, whether the drugs are intended for personal consumption is a matter that goes to mitigation rather than a requisite element to determine guilt (Chan Mung Lung [1992] 2 HKCLR 127; Chung Kam Fai [1993] 1 HKCLR 178; and Hiroyuki Sato [1994] 1 HKCLR 119). 2.This case was defended on the basis of a total denial. There was no claim of personal consumption. Clear record is not a strong mitigating ground in serious offences such as drug trafficking. In accordance with the sentence tariff in Lau Tak Ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370, I sentence the defendant to a term of 5 ½ years imprisonment.
|